I
certainly feel unqualified to report on this in any depth, but yesterday I went
to a lecture by His Holiness the XIV Dalai Lama, and what blogger worth her
salt could fail to at least mention it? It was curiosity more than
reverence that motivated me. After all, who could resist an opportunity to see
one of the great spiritual leaders of our time, a beloved icon recognized
throughout the world? Tickets for his two lectures at UCSB went on sale in
early December and sold out within two hours. I was out of town at the
time, but my dear friend Kelley bought me one as a birthday present. The
lecture she chose was titled The Nature of Mind, which sounded
pretty interesting.
It
was a chilly gray morning but the campus was crowded and festive as we inched
our way towards the security checkpoint at the entrance to the event center. We
climbed up the bleachers and found our seats in the distant shadows, and then I
went down again for a preemptive rest room stop. The queue for the ladies’ room
was absurdly long, but it was hilarious to see how many
"women-of-a-certain-age" had had the same thought, and we were all of
a type: a bit disheveled and vaguely hippie-esque, our post-prime plainness
countered by colorful scarves or an ethnic-looking necklace, all in practical shoes
and intrepid spirits. A woman in a purple fleece jacket was telling her friend
about the condors she had glimpsed during a recent foray into the backcountry.
Someone else was talking about her recent trip to Bhutan. After seeing me greet
two old friends, the woman standing behind me tapped my shoulder and asked,
“Oh, how do you know Dan and Linda?” The line crawled along and we joked
about our bladders and finally, mission accomplished, I returned to my seat
just in time.
Everyone
rose when His Holiness appeared on the distant stage along with Chancellor
Henry Yang and a dean and professor or two. Dressed in a red robe with a
saffron undergarment, he turned away from the audience to pray and bow to a
Buddha image, lowering his body and touching the ground with his arms and
forehead three times. The vast auditorium was hushed as he positioned himself
cross-legged on the yellow cushion of a carved wooden sofa at the center of the
stage and began to speak: “My dear brothers and sisters…usually my voice a
little better…” He clearly had a terrible cold.
And
never having heard him speak, I had not known how difficult it was to
understand him. This was partly because this lecture was exactly that: a lecture,
and at times I felt as though I was sitting in the advanced graduate course
without having taken the basic 101. Among other things, he talked about the
various states of consciousness, including the brain activity that exists after
death. After speaking in heavily accented English for a short time, he switched
to his native Tibetan, pausing intermittently for translation.
His
interpreter was a professorial gentleman in a dark suit who sat with
rod-straight posture on a small chair on the stage. And he was brilliant, I
must say, for he translated with a quickness and elegance that was simply
stunning, and some of the passages were long and complex and required more than
just a literal translation but explanation and pedagogy. The lecture was quite
technical, including passages from Buddhist texts and discussion of various
states of the mind. Perhaps it was directed toward university scholars or the
rows of monks who sat in the front row chairs just below the stage. High up in
the bleachers, I could sense the audience growing bored and fidgety. It seemed
unimaginable to walk out on the Dalai Llama, but I noticed a few who did.
I thought he was a trooper. I imagined that he might have preferred to stay in bed on this particular morning, but he diligently forged ahead. He paused now and then to sniff and cough and blow his nose, but meticulously covered his topic. I wondered what it would be like to have been chosen as a child to lead such a rare and astonishing life, but I could not begin to picture it. Yet he seemed a gentle and good-natured man with a sense of humor and humility. He has described himself as a simple monk.
Here
are a few points I was able to glean from the talk:
The
only way to reduce destructive emotion is to increase constructive emotions.
Simply
focusing on the sensory level of experience is not adequate.
If
one observes the mind, one can perceive a sequence of thought processes with
tiny intervals in between. The trick, through meditation, would be to try to
“tease up” these transitional periods and hold onto them. These gaps between
the arising of thought and the dissolution of thought represent true moments of
consciousness.
To
attain such consciousness, we must refrain from chasing retrospective or
future-directed thought, remaining simply in the present. Through practice, one
can learn to recognize the gap or absence of thought, and prolong it. The
result is a clear-line state of mind, a sense of pure wonderment that allows
for the natural quality of the mind to express itself.
H-m-m-m.
No doubt a lifetime of discipline and practice is required to attain this,
but another point His Holiness made is that motivation is the bottom line. “The
mind creates the world,” he said (I think), “and the mind creates the action
that leads to that creation.”
H-m-m-m.
His
personality emerged more fully when questions were presented that had been
posted via email. Is it harder in America, someone had asked, with its fast
pace and constant stimulation, to achieve a tranquil state of mind? “I don’t
think that much difference,” he replied. “Same human mind everywhere. External influence
important, but nature of mind same.”
Another
question: Can you explain what you meant when you said that Buddhism is not a
religion but a science of mind?
His answer: “I didn’t say this. Western
scholar said it. Ask him.”
When
asked about the use of LSD and other drugs to achieve enlightenment, he said
that although he had not tried them himself, it seemed to him that they
produced a great profusion of illusion, and since we already have plenty of
illusory experiences, what was the point? Serious practice should rely not on
these external things but rather on internal work.
I
very much wanted to hear him answer the question on how he maintains a
peaceful, happy heart when life is such hard work, and how to stay true to
one’s principles, but he smiled and said that question was for the afternoon
lecture, which was titled Ethics for Our Time. Its focus would be on compassion, and I later heard it was a more accessible talk, but I’m grateful
for the experience I had, and I feel that I have a lot to ponder.
In
his travels throughout the world during all the years of his exile, His
Holiness has been an emissary of peace and an advocate for compassion and nonviolence. “Our happiness,” he
has said, “is inextricably bound up with the happiness of others. There is no
denying that the more our hearts and minds are afflicted with ill will, the
more miserable we become. Thus, we can reject everything else: religion,
ideology, all received wisdom. But we cannot escape the necessity of love and
compassion.”
“So
are you enlightened?” wrote my mischievous friend Cornelia.
Obviously
not. But I am A Woman Who Has Seen the Dalai Lama.